I thought it would be an interesting exercise to collate all the historic marathon data I could find into one place. There are some gaps, and I will keep trying to fill these.
| Year | Event | Time | Position | Age position | Field | |
| 1994 | London | 03:05:00 | ||||
| 1995 | London | 02:59:35 | ||||
| 2001 | London | 02:56:09 | 696 | 425 | 23,335 | |
| 2002 | London | 02:54:00 | ||||
| 2002 | Jungfrau | 03:56:21 | 160 | 106 | ||
| 2006 | London | 02:48:44 | 483 | 116 | ||
| 2008 | Clarendon | 03:16:41 | 3 | 1 | 293 | |
| 2009 | Clarendon | 03:07:05 | 4 | 2 | 392 | |
| 2010 | Clarendon | 03:21:04 | 12 | 1 | ||
| 2012 | Jungfrau | 04:01:27 | 198 | 34 | 2985 | |
| 2012 | Clarendon | 03:13:41 | 5 | 2 | 406 |
It's not a terribly valuable dataset the ability to compare like with like and draw conclusions is a bit limited. You just can't compare times or positions between my three routes to date.
London - I've had a good innings here, driving down to within 2 min 48 seconds of elite qualification. For a while I was fired up about taking this further, but I've since lost desire to pound the streets in a relentless search for speed in a flat, urban setting.
Jungfrau - This year I kept to within 5 minutes of my 2002 time which I guess is respectable but still a bit frustrating. More on this topic here.
Clarendon - It's hard to draw much from the times because so much depends on the conditions underfoot on this cross-country course, and that's precisely why I enjoy it so much. I had a dreadful time in 2010 (see this post), but that was only five minutes off my best-ever marathon position in 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.